None. As an example. I'm super interested in God of War Ragnarok, Horizon Forbidden West, and Zelda TotK... but I'm not paying $70. I know that I would dump over 200 hours into TotK if it's anything like BotW. But I'm still not paying $70 for just the game. CE, yeah, I'll pay the $130 for the CE because it's a CE and it's Zelda, but that's not the game that's selling me, it's the CE. So to value a game and say "Yeah, I'd pay $100" no, never. Stuff like Rule of Rose, you're not paying $100 because you think oh man, this game is good and it's worth $100, you're paying it because it's rare and collectible, and in theory if you wanted to sell it, it would probably hold value. And if I understand the question correctly, my answer is no.
The closest thing would be something like Elden Ring, that game is my GOAT, that said, I spent over probably over $400 on that game, I bought Xbox standard, Xbox CE, and 2 steam copies... and I'll probably buy at least one PS4/PS5 copy at some point. I've dumped hundreds upon hundreds of hours into that game, but the amount of money I spent wasn't on a single copy, it was on multiple copies so I could play with my wife. So if spending $100 on two copies counts, then sure, but $100 per copy? I wouldn't pay it.
The trouble is that even if a game ticks all the boxes, I could find 100 other games that tick some boxes and not even spend $100.