I wasn't familiar with her until I read the Wikipedia page. I thought this tidbit was insulting:
"After the Utah State University death threats, Rolling Stone called her "pop culture's most valuable critic," saying that "the backlash has only made her point for her: Gaming has a problem."
Gaming has a problem? Rolling Stone has always been one of the worst excuses of a magazine. It's like a swarm of stinkbugs on your screen door. It's like a broken toilet that someone used. It's trash in print form. And this quote from them has reinforced my point. Gaming doesn't have a problem. How does it have a problem? Because some woman wants to address the issues of how women are portrayed in video games?
I feel bad that this woman got endlessly harassed and threatened, but it sounds like she just wants attention and is giving gamers a bad name.
You don't remember the ongoing discussion about her/this topic that we had on RPG'sEE,
Kash?
I'm pretty sure that, (a small minority) of the community - made the stupidly shitty, immensely ignorant, blatantly bullshit, & super-sexist comments that
kimimi wound up closing her G*FAQs account over.
Anywho, iirc - it was mainly (
creek & myself); who were basically bashing her ethics & her (lack of) any financial transparency and/or responsibility.
I believe that - it started out as a Kickstarter that was (originally) asking for what seemed like a reasonable amount of start-up money. I'm not sure...maybe it was a couple thousand bucks, or so to make a video about women's tropes & stereotypes in gaming; fair enough.
Then, after reaching her goal, she (*
supposedly*) got all of this extremely vitriolic feedback & death-threats from internet neanderthals ("
supposedly"); because there was A LOT of speculation & concern (but, little concrete/damning evidence) of it being a bunch of '
astro-turfing' (read: all of these horrible & terrible posts/threats, originating from herself, her friends, etc)...to draw attention to, gain sympathy for, and - ultimately - make more money.
It worked.
She wound up with, I want to say it was $100,000 - $200,000!
No change in the scope of the project...no accounting/returning of ALL of that extra "above & beyond" money, no extra rewards to the original backers, etc.
Rolling Stone magazine?
I really can't say anything one way or the other...I doubt that I've read more than a couple of pages of it, in my entire life.