VGCollect Forum

VGCollect Site Stuff => Site Feedback => Topic started by: foxhack on May 30, 2011, 05:09:21 pm

Title: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: foxhack on May 30, 2011, 05:09:21 pm
So I was adding a few things to my collection when I saw http://vgcollect.com/item/11189 - which had a description that sounded horribly familiar. I realized that the text was taken from http://www.mobygames.com/game/snk-arcade-classics-vol-1 - an entry I helped to create.

When the MobyGames admins find out that users of this site are taking the descriptions from them, they are not going to be happy. And now that they're owned by GameFly, they have access to loads and loads of lawsuit-happy laywers.

You might want to make a point of not using their written descriptions in entries. (Though they don't really mind people using their release dates since they're a reference site.)
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on May 30, 2011, 09:07:39 pm
Not cool.

As far as all around, generic, info: like release dates, item numbers, Pub/ Dev, unwatermarked box art images,  etc... that's fine, but plagiarizing descriptions isn't cool.

Actually, I've always said, and it's in the style guide, that "The Description should be, if anything, a brief description of the game. Or notes about the games packaging variants/ pack ins/ collector's edition details." Like trivia about the game, such as if it's a launch title, or if it's the last game released for a system. If it had a variant, you can explain the variation, If it had a bonus cd packed in with it or something.

If you notice any more of these, feel free to edit them out. I've been trying to catch them as I see them.

Thanks for pointing it out Fox

Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: tpugmire on May 31, 2011, 08:47:53 am
I've noticed this as well.  I only add descriptions if it's some oddball thing like the NES 3 and 5 screw variants.  A new user was editing NES descriptions the other day and it was obvious that they were copied from somewhere else.  Currently we can't reject edits, only accept them.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on May 31, 2011, 10:28:08 am
Currently we can't reject edits, only accept them.


This is definitely a big peeve of mine. That needs to be fixed asap.

Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: tpugmire on May 31, 2011, 10:55:00 am
The watermarked images bother me too, perhaps I should start another list...
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on May 31, 2011, 01:22:37 pm
Agreed, of course anything related to blatantly lifting something from someone else annoys the hell out of me. If you can't scan the box art/ disc images yourself, there are plenty of sources for art, why be lazy and use a watermarked version.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: amauriel on May 31, 2011, 01:38:12 pm
Yeah, I've tried to be really careful on my art...and I've got a few things that I couldn't find good art on, giving me another reason to get my camera out and actually photograph MY collection. Hopefully you don't catch any of mine! (And please, please, let me know with a PM if you do. I don't want to be the cause.)
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: foxhack on June 01, 2011, 01:29:41 am
Not cool.


Exactly the kind of answer I was hoping for. Most other sites would just go "Eh, who cares."

Guess I'm staying onboard now.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on June 01, 2011, 09:04:12 am
Not cool.


Exactly the kind of answer I was hoping for. Most other sites would just go "Eh, who cares."

Guess I'm staying onboard now.


Welcome back on board.

Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on June 01, 2011, 09:23:35 pm
Updated the style guide to reflect this.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: tpugmire on June 02, 2011, 09:06:23 am
What about descriptions taken from wikipedia?  Someone has been doing this, but they have been giving credit to wikipedia.  Personally I'm not a big fan of wikipedia, because I've found it to be inaccurate a lot of the time.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on June 14, 2011, 12:29:01 pm
I'd say, just ditch any descriptions of the game and only list misc trivia, pack-ins, variations that are related to the game itself.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: foxhack on June 14, 2011, 03:11:02 pm
I've been adding some GOG descriptions to their entries, like in this case: -- http://vgcollect.com/item/16695

Includes the original POSTAL 2, POSTAL 2 Share the Pain multiplayer expansion and POSTAL 2 Apocalypse Weekend expansion.

It's basically box text, so.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on June 17, 2011, 10:35:34 am
Ya that's no problem. I just have big issues with straight hijacking of descriptions from other reference sites.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: jonathonstriker on June 19, 2011, 12:07:47 am
If we are going to get info from another site, we should at least get it from a useful and legit site like gamefaqs.com Wikipedia isn't often as accurate as Gamefaqs, which has probably the largest database of video games info and cheats. Allowing the user to edit details is nice for some of us, but there needs to be a way to reject those that don't follow the style format, and to close those that have all of the information filled out (properly).
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: foxhack on June 19, 2011, 03:22:04 pm
GameFAQs can be just as bad as Wikipedia.

The only two databases I fully trust are VGRebirth (for release dates and most other info they track) and MobyGames (for credits, product codes, ratings and developer info).
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: jonathonstriker on July 07, 2011, 11:26:56 pm
any site can be bad about their info, but that's why a little research is always good. Most info I have found so far on wiki is right, but I've only looked up so much as far as games are concerned.

Also, if anyone is taking info, the source should be cited properly (such as [Wikipedia], or [source info: VGRebirth]. It's respectful to the author(s), and shows us you didn't just go make it all up.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: darko on August 02, 2011, 11:11:25 pm
The image for the Battletoads & Double Dragon cart needs to be removed. It's watermarked. I'd replace it but I can't find an acceptable image anywhere.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on August 03, 2011, 01:59:22 am
K, I'll look into it. Thanks for the heads up Darko.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on August 11, 2011, 12:25:11 am
BTW @darko, this is now fixed.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on August 22, 2011, 02:00:52 pm
I noticed a bunch of watermarked images cropping up. If anyone runs across them, could you please search out a proper unwatermarked version and update the game info. Thanks.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: jonathonstriker on October 02, 2011, 02:46:56 pm
I'll keep an eye out. I hate those too and have been careful not to use many sites due to it. Play-Asia is where I like to get my imports, but I never will use their images unless it is in a blog.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: snakes on October 22, 2011, 05:05:17 pm
I copied some descriptions from wikipedia for games that I entered, should I go back and edit those out?

And another question: for Steam games should I put the store's description blurb into the Box text section here?
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: madmax on October 22, 2011, 05:25:16 pm
Snakes, the games description is usually what the game cones with or a little blurb about it.

"Comes with anime DVD"

Stuff like that. its very unclear though, I know :p
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on October 22, 2011, 05:57:02 pm
@matt's been meaning to change the name of the "description" field. But he's been working on other behind the scenes stuff and hasn't gotten around to it.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: snakes on October 22, 2011, 08:24:57 pm
I'll delete the descriptions I entered then. I'll leave the steam blurbs under box text cause I think that's the digital equivalent. Let me know if I should remove those too.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on October 22, 2011, 08:45:23 pm
@snakes, ya the blurbs from Steam, Xbox.com, Nintendo.com, etc all count as box text. So you're good on that. :)
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: pacpix on January 06, 2012, 11:07:14 pm
So if I read this right we can take cover art from other websites?  I want to just make sure before I add any covers or carts because I currently do not have a scanner to use my own games, but would like to add cover art to the games missing it in my collection.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on January 07, 2012, 05:29:55 am
Personally, I don't see a problem with unwatermarked images. Based on search results, folks find the pics we have on our site and snag them all the time. It's the ones that have watermarks on them that are a no-no.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: matt on January 07, 2012, 07:17:03 am
Legally it's no problem either. I know I explained it all in another thread but I can't seem to find it. Basically the scanner isn't the artist and has no rights to the image.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: pacpix on January 07, 2012, 10:16:31 am
Ok thanks!
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: foxhack on January 07, 2012, 11:35:41 am
Just make sure it's a REAL cover. Some sites like The Cover Project post custom covers, which are great, but not useful to us for obvious reasons.

Also, try to double check the image with your own copy of the game if possible. Sites may have promo or not final artwork with differences in ESRB rating, different artwork, no UPC, wrong product code, etc.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: pacpix on January 07, 2012, 05:14:53 pm
Yeah I have noticed the promo artwork on some games.  I just had not changed it because of I was not sure if it was OK to take art from other sites.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: psydswipe on January 09, 2012, 03:29:27 am
Legally it's no problem either. I know I explained it all in another thread but I can't seem to find it. Basically the scanner isn't the artist and has no rights to the image.


Are you sure it wasn't this thread? I think there used to be more posts here and that was well before the data loss. I had been the last person to post in this thread months ago but my post is gone. I'm quite certain it was this thread. I had disagreed about taking box scans, but this isn't my website :)
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: maximkat on February 29, 2012, 07:14:04 am
I've scanned in anything that I have myself, with the exception of my Naki Eliminator NES Cleaner because what i own ins't the complete package.  I gave a courtesy link to the nesrepairshop.com in the description and it was accepted, hopefully that's ok.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: foxhack on March 01, 2012, 01:48:46 pm
Uh... I don't think it is.
Title: Re: So what's the site's opinion on taking info from other sites?
Post by: scott on March 01, 2012, 01:57:43 pm
Uh... I don't think it is.


Anything that is not a description of the box or games misc info or variations shouldn't be listed in the description field.