Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - pfogel

Pages: [1] 2
1
I only looked for German sources since it is the German release.

https://gametasy.de/welche-version-von-god-of-war-ragaroek-solltest-du-kaufen/
In the Launch Edition passage the first sentence states that it is only the preorder bonus, not a real version. The last sentence states that you get the version by ordering pre release.
Quote
Launch Edition
Die Überschrift ist ein wenig irreführend, denn genau genommen ist das keine Edition, sondern der Vorbestellerbonus.
Quote
Du bekommst den Bonus, indem du dir das Spiel vor dem Release am 09. November 2022 holst.

https://www.netzwelt.de/news/205701-god-of-war-ragnaroek-vorbestellen-starttermin-editionen-zusatzinhalte-1507.html
The Standard und Launch Edition passage states that the launch edition will be the standard edition after the release and will be only available by preordering the game.
Quote
Standard und Launch Edition
Vor Release von God of War Ragnarök könnt ihr die Launch Edition kaufen. Diese Edition wird nach Veröffentlichung des Spiels zur Standard Edition, bei der ihr dann keine Boni mehr erhaltet. Die Launch Edition könnt ihr also nur über Vorbestellung kaufen.

https://www.gamestar.de/artikel/god-of-war-ragnaroek-vorbestellen-exklusive-launch-edition-sichern,3386331.html
This site even states that the launch edition is exclusive to Mediamarkt/Saturn. Therefore all other shops should have selling the standard edition since release.
Quote
Das bekommt ihr in der Launch Edition
Die Launch Edition ist verfügbar für die PS4 oder die PS5 und nur bei MediaMarkt und Saturn erhältlich.

2
Hey,
I did an edit to the God of War Ragnarök (https://vgcollect.com/item/283064) release date (Nov. 9 2022) which got rejected because it is not the launch edition.

Every source I found states that the standard edition is the default edition to buy after Nov. 9 2022 and the launch edition was only a preorder bonus. I could imagine that there were more launch editions than preorders but wouldn't that still qualify as released on the same date?

3
Video Game Database Discussion / Re: Developer/Publisher Requests
« on: June 15, 2025, 07:47:29 pm »
https://vgcollect.com/item/172449
Developer: D-Pad Studio


5
Video Game Database Discussion / Re: Developer/Publisher Requests
« on: May 06, 2025, 04:54:16 pm »
Developer not in the list

https://vgcollect.com/item/282415
Developer: Sandfall Interactive


6
News / Re: Site Status
« on: March 12, 2025, 04:48:41 pm »
Just looked through my collection and 16 front images are missing. For many I was the one initially uploading them and since I keep them on my drive I can just reupload them.

Just a question out of interest? Will the finished list be back? When it was introduced I moved the finished date from the collection note to the finished list with the purchase date as the finishing date. Would be nice to have them back.

7
News / Re: Advanced Style Guide update and feedback thread
« on: January 15, 2024, 09:37:08 pm »
I'm pretty confused with the explanation for Item numbers in the style guides. Not only in comparison of the two guides, but mostly because of the advanced guide itself.

The advanced style guide ( https://vgcollect.com/forum/index.php/topic,10837.msg178223.html#msg178223 ) has a priority list as
Quote
The priority list of which number is added to the item number field in the DB is:
1. The spine or side
2. The back
3. The front
4. Hidden or only on sealed samples
5. The media
Additional item numbers should be put into the description.

In the following explanations front and media is never mentioned but I think front is still pretty clear.

Hidden or only on sealed samples is within that 5 point list, but the explanations states those numbers should put into the description.
For the hidden numbers:
Quote
In the previous example we had shown how Nintendo has a number to represent the game, and another to represent the release. On older boxed releases this is the same but the item numbers are printed on the box tab/flap. Because it is impossible to see this number on a sealed sample, we put this into the description instead.

Just like the box flaps I wouldn't see the Item number of the Media on a sealed sample. Additionally the hidden numbers are prior to media on the list. Would I put media numbers in the description as well?
If so, I think the official style guide would also be misleading.

From the official style guide ( https://vgcollect.com/forum/index.php/topic,22.0.html ):
Quote
Item numbers are the factory assigned number given to each product. Item number field priority is: Package spine, Package back, or that which is printed on the enclosed media. Additional item numbers can be put into the description field, including where that item number is located.
So the priority is
1. Spine
2. Back
3. Media

While I'm not sure about the media, based on the advanced guide I would have assumed to put the box flap number into the Item number field.

8
It seems i'm unable to find any information on SNSP-ARJP-EUR-2, everything I see is the SNSP-ARJP-EUR-1 for THQ.

Quote
If it's confirmed by some sources for the JVC release to have been released on March 30, 1995, that information can be supplied and will be approved if it's resubmitted
It might not be perfect proof but I still want to show what I found

I just researched for a bit and ended up looking through old magazines linked in the sources of the Wikipedia page for the game. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Star_Wars:_Return_of_the_Jedi )

JVC
- Source 12 is a PDF which has a review of Return of the Jedi on page 122-123 (Or 150-151 in the PDF) which only mentions JVC as the publisher.
- The back side of the manual of the JVC version also states it's exclusively published and distributed by JVC ( A readable picture of the manual is in this offer https://www.ebay.de/itm/134467651291 ).

THQ
- Source 6 of Wikipedia is also a PDF which states that Super Return of the Jedi will be rereleased by THQ alongside the special editions of the movies in 1997 (Just a short sentence in brackets on the bottom of page 22).
- The manual of THQ also does not mention any exclusivity ( A readable picture of the manual is in this offer https://www.ebay.de/itm/364631466342 ).

This would align with the info from gamefaqs.
Most other sources I saw state that the original release was by JVC and THQ only did a rerelease but those were mostly only some forum entries or sites were I don't know if the info is user distributed - such as snes central.

EDIT: Added the Wikipedia page for better traceability

9
(I guess this thread is correct until one is created for 2024?)

My edit of the release date for Super Star Wars: Return of the Jedi (JVC) ( https://vgcollect.com/item/64426 ) was rejected.
The comment was
Quote
There are two variants for this item. Until we can confirm when exactly each was released, no Date field information should be supplied.
Are those two versions from THQ / JVC?
I got the date form gamefaqs ( https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/snes/563220-super-star-wars-return-of-the-jedi/data ) where the THQ version is listed with a release in 1997 whereas the JVC version is from 03/30/1995, which I tried to enter.

Do I miss another version of JVC?

10
My edit of the item number for Lylat Wars [DE] (https://vgcollect.com/item/40187) was rejected.
I used the number above the barcode on the back of the box.
Any reason why it was rejected?

For reference: this ebay offer has a good image of the back
https://www.ebay.de/itm/374895209235

11
Video Game Database Discussion / Re: Ratings on Items with Multiple Ratings
« on: December 29, 2023, 01:45:53 pm »
I will pay more attention if multiple ratings are present. Should the Baten Kaitos example be removed or replaced to a better one?

12
Video Game Database Discussion / Ratings on Items with Multiple Ratings
« on: December 28, 2023, 07:13:39 pm »
Hey

I had a recent rejected edit on an item because I used the wrong rating (USK) on it, even though it was a general European release ( https://vgcollect.com/item/142190 ). So ELSPA would have been correct since it's not a German exclusive. - This one is clear to me.

I  just created the German entry for Persona 5 Tactica on Switch ( https://vgcollect.com/item/259181 ). Without a second thought I used the USK rating since everything on the box is German and I bought it in Germany.  After creation I saw the PEGI logo on box and after the recent rejected edit I wasn't sure if I need to switch the rating of the entry.

Looking into the Advanced Style Guide and the explanation for ratings with the example of Baten Kaitos, I'd say the info provided is correct (To save the search: https://vgcollect.com/forum/index.php/topic,10837.msg178222.html#msg178222 ). But looking into Baten Kaitos ( https://vgcollect.com/item/151319 ) the rating was changed from USK to PEGI even though this entry is the example for using the USK on multi-rating-entries. Since someone had to approve the edit, I'm not quite sure if I miss something here, the Style Guide should be updated or if the edit should be reversed.

13
Release date for Air Raid 3 (https://vgcollect.com/item/136934) was rejected because GameFAQs (https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/ps2/940043-air-raid-3/data) has a different date listed.

There are multiple releases of Air Raid 3, some with a different name (https://www.mobygames.com/game/104025/air-raid-3/releases/)
While there is a German version of it which released in 2006 (like GameFAQs listing) it released as Combat Ace with the EAN 8717774870891. The Item above with EAN    8717774870075 released in 2007 according to Mobygames.
I found a European release (https://www.gamepressure.com/games/air-raid-3/zc25e0#ps2) released on 23.02.2007.

14
Video Game Database Discussion / Re: Developer/Publisher Requests
« on: June 27, 2023, 06:27:15 am »
Developer:
Dimfrost Studio (Bramble: The Mountain King)


15
Video Game Database Discussion / Re: Error Listings and rejected edits 2022
« on: September 23, 2022, 07:56:11 am »
Tried to accept the developer with enter, which created the entry. I Didn't notice since I instantly went back and created another entry with more information
https://vgcollect.com/item/227585


Pages: [1] 2