| General and Gaming > Classic Video Games |
| Does anyone find the PS3, and xbox 360 boring? |
| << < (10/22) > >> |
| gf78:
--- Quote from: kashell on May 19, 2016, 02:37:31 pm ---Where did 80% even come from? That has to be from a random number generator or common core mathematics. --- End quote --- I'm still trying to figure out how a sequel to a game looking and playing better negates the fun of previous entries? Does Final Fantasy XV somehow make my experiences with Final Fantasy VII moot? Should I not enjoy Uncharted Drake's Fortune any longer because A Thief's End is out? It's preposterous. |
| gf78:
--- Quote from: sworddude on May 19, 2016, 02:46:01 pm ---Who says that I wanted to chance your opinion, plenty of people love the xbox 360, ps3 etc yet I'm not one of those guys. It is BTW you who actually responded to my post wich was not even intented to you. I'm pretty sure it is around 80% not that most of the other games are any good anyways. Like I said realistic games are the tradmark of these consoles only reason why I use the term. Never stated it is exactly 80% just an estimate. 95 - 99% of ps3 games suck in my opinion, ps3 and xbox 360 are the worst consoles ever made. I would not even want to see them games like uncharted on my shelves even if i got them for free. Would litterally toss them in the garbage can that's how much i appreciate most of the ps3 xbox 360 console games. I like especially older games and I pretty much don't care about current gen very few titles that pick my interest. Also your statement about rehash and little variety is also pretty false for the mario (kart) and smash games allot of things are different. Also the story line of the zelda game is also plenty different from other games i could give examples but there are far to many to state. Yet with titles as infamous, the next parts are just slightly better and the older games are far inferior and usually not worth it to play once again unless they messed up the new games. With assasins greed only the best titles with a certain time period will be replayed the others will be forgotten. --- End quote --- What is it with you, your hemorrhoids acting up or something? I'm allowed to reply to posts here. That's the point of the forum. ::) You are acting like a petulant child. You would throw away PS3 and 360 games if someone gave them to you? Do everyone here a favor before you do that: Let people know what you have and we will pay you to ship them to us. This sounds like the ravings of a rabbid fanboy. Mario Kart and Smash are pretty much the same game every iteration. They may adjust a tuning option here or add a character there, but they are essentially the same exact game with a fresh coat of paint. I never said the Zelda games didn't play differently, only that the stories are rehashes where there is no evolution to the storyline and instead restarts every time a bit differently. Your statement "Yet with titles as infamous, the next parts are just slightly better and the older games are far inferior and usually not worth it to play once again..." is absolutely ridiculous and a complete contradiction to your collecting habits and statements. You collect and play games primarily for older systems. So...do you not play older Mario or Smash games? You don't play older Zelda games? As I see it, it's more that you are being a hypocrite and bashing the collective libraries of two of the greatest consoles ever released and saying that once a new game comes out, it's useless to go back and play a previous and crappier entry in a series on them while simultaneously singing the praises of going back and collecting & playing Nintendo and Sega games. By your reasoning, you have never played a 2D Mario game since Mario 64. Right? Because we all know that 2D is inferior to the 3D releases like Galaxy, right? ::) |
| sworddude:
--- Quote from: gf78 on May 19, 2016, 03:08:32 pm --- --- Quote from: sworddude on May 19, 2016, 02:46:01 pm ---Who says that I wanted to chance your opinion, plenty of people love the xbox 360, ps3 etc yet I'm not one of those guys. It is BTW you who actually responded to my post wich was not even intented to you. I'm pretty sure it is around 80% not that most of the other games are any good anyways. Like I said realistic games are the tradmark of these consoles only reason why I use the term. Never stated it is exactly 80% just an estimate. 95 - 99% of ps3 games suck in my opinion, ps3 and xbox 360 are the worst consoles ever made. I would not even want to see them games like uncharted on my shelves even if i got them for free. Would litterally toss them in the garbage can that's how much i appreciate most of the ps3 xbox 360 console games. I like especially older games and I pretty much don't care about current gen very few titles that pick my interest. Also your statement about rehash and little variety is also pretty false for the mario (kart) and smash games allot of things are different. Also the story line of the zelda game is also plenty different from other games i could give examples but there are far to many to state. Yet with titles as infamous, the next parts are just slightly better and the older games are far inferior and usually not worth it to play once again unless they messed up the new games. With assasins greed only the best titles with a certain time period will be replayed the others will be forgotten. --- End quote --- What is it with you, your hemorrhoids acting up or something? I'm allowed to reply to posts here. That's the point of the forum. ::) Your statement "Yet with titles as infamous, the next parts are just slightly better and the older games are far inferior and usually not worth it to play once again..." is absolutely ridiculous and a complete contradiction to your collecting habits and statements. You collect and play games primarily for older systems. So...do you not play older Mario or Smash games? You don't play older Zelda games? As I see it, it's more that you are being a hypocrite and bashing the collective libraries of two of the greatest consoles ever released and saying that once a new game comes out, it's useless to go back and play a previous and crappier entry in a series on them while simultaneously singing the praises of going back and collecting & playing Nintendo and Sega games. By your reasoning, you have never played a 2D Mario game since Mario 64. Right? Because we all know that 2D is inferior to the 3D releases like Galaxy, right? ::) --- End quote --- With slightly better I mean adding a few things here and there. That's aside from the point. I've played them nes to wii u games. All games are different and fun to play don't give me that crap about slightly better. What I say applies for ps3 and xbox 360 games since the newer parts aren't that much different. Sega and nintendo titles are memorable and the occasional ps2 titles such as ico and shadow of the collosus. 2D and 3D are different, 2D games can be better than 3D games and he other way around. Also putting mario games aside I do prefer 2D games, I am a sega guy after all, sega sure does have many good 3D games ::) Furthermore your going way off topic were talking about why ps3 and xbox 360 games have low value and why the wii actually has value. With what I said before being part of that reason. Wii games aren't rare and yet titles such as mario and pokemon retain there value the only thing I'm saying is that those titles are unique unlike games such as infamous 1 and 2 the 2nd one being superior and the first one forgotten since the games don't have to much of a variety except for the story. If a next one will be made It;s all about the newest game older games will be forgotten. Has nothing to do with my opinion. |
| turf:
Massive walls of text.... over and over.... Walls of Text :o |
| maximo310:
Sworddude, some of those statements above would actually seem reasonable if it was just about your opinion, but you instead act like its the ultimate truth. It's ridiculously biased to say that the ps3 and the xbox 360 are the worst consoles ever and that 95% of the library is horrible garbage and then put Nintendo up on a pedestal by saying that their games are always unique. That has become increasingly harder to believe if you look at the main series output of stuff like Mario, Paper Mario, Star Fox, etc. and interviews with those developers show that the big N is gonna require a lot of work to change because of the rigidity of many in the company. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |