Giant cultivation centers first read to me as a center to cultivate giant babies. I imagined a mother and father visiting their 15 foot baby crawling around a farm and it made me smile. However, as for the actual meat of the issue...
Would I have a baby this way? Probably not. The first major barrier is I don't want kids, but forgoing that, it would still be a low priority over natural birth just for the experience. Problems like infertility, poor health, or even a woman not wanting to experience the pain of childbirth or even wanting to maintain a figure would be fine reasons. It also depends how far along the technology is. If we are at the point where you can manipulate the fetus' genetics to make it
the perfect Aryan uebermensch completely healthy and free of genetic diseases I have heard arguments for how it would be immoral to not go this route, to which I agree to a certain extent. In a future where babies could not only be healthy, but manipulated to have the eye/hair color, size, etc. you want there are a lot of options... and I have no moral issues with this because the process is just goop turning into different goop to begin with, nothing magical. However, in a time when this is the safest way, you will absolutely have hipster parents who want to go against the norm, but mostly religious fundamentalist who will be gripping harder than ever to their ideals with this technology making it harder and harder to justify their idea that humans are some special, chosen thing.
Off to the cum and joke mines of Mars men go.
I know it was a quick quip from South Park, but let's explore this, as I do so love exploring things. This tech would actually have the opposite effect. Because of the way birth works women have always been genetically more valuable than men. A man can impregnate 100s (or 1000s, or millions, talk about a player) of women at a time, but a woman can only carry once at a time in a process that takes months. This has been levied into the way our society works because it makes sense biologically - men typically provide for women because that uterus is valuable, much more so then our expendable sperm. Nearly everything about our society and attitudes stems from this. However, you replace the biological need and women in their primary biological role become as expendable as men. From a biological standpoint, the expenditure of resources to a woman is to create offspring, but now that a womb is not required it makes much more sense to expend those resources on your offspring and yourself. Now it wouldn't change overnight, and men would still want sex, but the societal role of women will change drastically overtime. Their value would drop significantly, and less men would put up with providing for them. The reason men are so competitive and have shorter, longer bell curves for most abilities was always about gaining female attention to reproduce, which caused us to evolve that way.
Societally, I don't think women would lose basic rights, but many of the privileged treatments they receive would likely dry up. Then once sex robots show up (if they haven't already assuming the tech we are talking about) they would have the true equality that all (modern) feminists will fight tooth and nail to stop. It probably doesn't go the other way because if we created artificial sperm women would still want the provisions from men which was historically what they got in return for child rearing (and sex), as even highly educated women overwhelmingly choose to marry up to someone making more.
(Disclaimer: Men & Women are equal in rights and almost all levels of potential. It's current year, and people get offended by everything, so I felt this was necessary.)