Error Listings and rejected edits 2024

[tripredacus]

Not sure if this is the proper forum, but here goes.  With the creation of a new 3DO [KR] category, the following items should be transferred to the new section:

https://www.vgcollect.com/item/262973
https://www.vgcollect.com/item/115027
https://www.vgcollect.com/item/115026
https://www.vgcollect.com/item/262977
https://www.vgcollect.com/item/115028
https://www.vgcollect.com/item/262580
https://www.vgcollect.com/item/115029
https://www.vgcollect.com/item/262582

You can submit the edits to change to the new category.

[nathan776]

https://vgcollect.com/item/263783 https://www.ricardo.ch/de/a/fifa-11-ps2-1240419710/
https://vgcollect.com/item/263856 https://www.ebay.at/itm/126125038318

Quick clarification to my edit. (As it is a bit Strange)
Seemingly the FIFA 11 release is unique in the series as it does not follow the set pattern.
It appears that the First item is a cross AT and CH Release while the Second item is just AT. As such I'm having to use the item number as a descriptor.

[tripredacus]

https://vgcollect.com/item/263783 https://www.ricardo.ch/de/a/fifa-11-ps2-1240419710/
https://vgcollect.com/item/263856 https://www.ebay.at/itm/126125038318

Quick clarification to my edit. (As it is a bit Strange)
Seemingly the FIFA 11 release is unique in the series as it does not follow the set pattern.
It appears that the First item is a cross AT and CH Release while the Second item is just AT. As such I'm having to use the item number as a descriptor.

As these item numbers appear on the back, you need to put in description

Other back item number: n

[nathan776]

https://vgcollect.com/item/58161
Barcode edit to 5030930041984 as barcode doesn't match Images - NL barcode - Uk Images.

[price5474]

blank one

https://vgcollect.com/item/263962

[Veilor]

Jumbo Funko Pops need to denoted by something in the title, title gets denied due to it. Please explain further why it can't be in the title what edition this pop is? Or should there be two squirtle entries with the exact same naming. because right now the Jumbo version is the one in the database and the small one needs to be added.

https://vgcollect.com/item/168704 - This is the Jumbo edition, what they call their 10 inches https://funko.com/pop-jumbo-glaceon/68378.html, it's not the regular small squirtle pop

The edition should be at the end should it not? Or am I thinking about it wrongly?

[dhaabi]

Jumbo Funko Pops need to denoted by something in the title, title gets denied due to it. Please explain further why it can't be in the title what edition this pop is? Or should there be two squirtle entries with the exact same naming. because right now the Jumbo version is the one in the database and the small one needs to be added.

https://vgcollect.com/item/168704 - This is the Jumbo edition, what they call their 10 inches https://funko.com/pop-jumbo-glaceon/68378.html, it's not the regular small squirtle pop

The edition should be at the end should it not? Or am I thinking about it wrongly?

Jumbo Edition should not be added to the Name, as nowhere on the item's packaging is that term used, as seen from this eBay listing. Even from the Funko store page link you provided (for another item, mind you), the term "Jumbo Edition" isn't used, so supplying the term to the Alt-Name field should also be omitted.

There are numerous variants for the Squirtle Funko Pop figures such as this one, but only one entry exists in the database. So, until variant entries are added, entry name descriptors should not be added to the Name field. But, at any point, additional information can be submitted to other fields which will help other members know exactly what 168704 is intended to represent, although the existing front art is fine in conveying that (despite its low effort and poor quality.) If at any point other entries are added, then descriptors such as (504) and (505) can be submitted.

However, I feel compelled to mention that, even though our database currently tracks these sorts of items, there shouldn't be some mass effort to catalog all these variants unless a member were to actually own them, simply because there are other sites far more suitable and dedicated to tracking toy (and specifically Funko) information. Only about half of our site's entry fields are relevant to toys specifically alongside very few members using the site to interact with these entries.

[lewcifer820]

https://vgcollect.com/item/230949

I recently submitted new photos, along with release date and rating info that was denied. The info I submitted is for the same item as this existing item. The PEGI12 rating is a sticker on the outside cellophane. Once the packaging is removed, the case has no rating on the front cover. (As depicted in the current stock photo used.) The release date info was sourced from gamefaqs for the Stricly Limited release, which this item is.
Additionally, the developer is specifically stated on the back cover as QUByte Game Studio, but this game is listed on the Qubyte Interactive website as them having handled the port. https://www.qubyteinteractive.com/site/?page_id=761
I assumed they were the same company and wasn't sure exactly  how to handle that one, but Qubyte Interactive was the only available option and it seemed correct to me.

[dhaabi]

https://vgcollect.com/item/230949

Every copy of the item I've found on eBay is sealed, like the one I linked to you in the Admin Comments, yet none feature the PEGI 12 rating label. To me, this indicates they're two different items—one with a PEGI 12 rating label and one without. Both should feature a USK 16 rating on the actual cartridgeas evident from the store product page, but I've not confirmed it.

Information should not be taken so blindly from other sources without verifying it yourself. Just like our site, sites like GameFAQs are user-submitted, meaning there is plenty of incorrect information. Here is a Twitter post dated October 21, 2022 which showcases the item, which is a full five weeks earlier than GameFAQ's November 28 listed date. For many online exclusive items, a specific date will never be able to be determined. At best, we can supply Month and Year. In this instance, without further information, Year alone is fine. All things considered, we therefore do not know when the PEGI 12 rating label variant was released, so not Release Date information should be submitted until confirmed.

Some staff confirm developer and publisher information through MobyGames, some others confirm it from the item itself. If there is conflicting data, I will always accept the submission so long as it is listed on one of those two sources. With that said, MobyGames lists the port being developed from Piko Interactive, whereas the product itself lists QUByte Game Studio as the developer. Sometimes publisher and developer names are similar but vary as they're different entities. I don't know if that's the case in this circumstance, though.

[smesgr]

https://vgcollect.com/item/11648

is a frankenstein entry:

data and cartridge pictures fits: 1983 Atari INC release
https://www.atarimania.com/game-atari-2600-vcs-jungle-hunt_7357.html

back cover fits: 1988 Atari CORP release
https://www.atarimania.com/game-atari-2600-vcs-jungle-hunt_18228.html

front cover could be either 1988 release or 1987 Atari CORP release
https://www.atarimania.com/game-atari-2600-vcs-jungle-hunt_18227.html

could this please be resolved. I could provide better pictures for a '88 release

[tripredacus]

https://vgcollect.com/item/11648

is a frankenstein entry:

data and cartridge pictures fits: 1983 Atari INC release
https://www.atarimania.com/game-atari-2600-vcs-jungle-hunt_7357.html

back cover fits: 1988 Atari CORP release
https://www.atarimania.com/game-atari-2600-vcs-jungle-hunt_18228.html

front cover could be either 1988 release or 1987 Atari CORP release
https://www.atarimania.com/game-atari-2600-vcs-jungle-hunt_18227.html

could this please be resolved. I could provide better pictures for a '88 release

It looks like front image is original and all the rest was added later, so everything was removed except the front image. So make it either of the two entries that you say are related to the front cover.

[nathan776]

Cool Boarders 4
https://vgcollect.com/item/29674

This barcode appears to be Australian, presumably wrong image front being used.
www.ebay.com.au/itm/325452306388?epid=25024723380


Also since I've already posted, no English language Eu version of Fire Pro Wrestling Returns exists so changing existing list to ES

[dhaabi]

Cool Boarders 4
https://vgcollect.com/item/29674

This barcode appears to be Australian, presumably wrong image front being used.
www.ebay.com.au/itm/325452306388?epid=25024723380

29674 merged into 228638. A proper entry for the Australian release has also been created, which is here.

[smesgr]

Your edit to Trevor McFur in the Crescent Galaxy was rejected.
Monday April 15th, 2024 at 10:34 AM
Field:    developer
New Value:    5745
Reason:    Information Already on File. Please see the VGCollect Style Guide or visit the Forums to clear up any listing questions.

No it isn't. Currently there is Atari in the system which is Warner owned Atari. There are 3x Ataris. in Early 1990s they have nothing to do with each other. Atari Corp. owned by Tramel, Atari Games former Namco owned and Atari Holding which is still owned by Warner.
Btw it would be nice to see which of the Mods discarded this.

[tripredacus]

Your edit to Trevor McFur in the Crescent Galaxy was rejected.
Monday April 15th, 2024 at 10:34 AM
Field:    developer
New Value:    5745
Reason:    Information Already on File. Please see the VGCollect Style Guide or visit the Forums to clear up any listing questions.

No it isn't. Currently there is Atari in the system which is Warner owned Atari. There are 3x Ataris. in Early 1990s they have nothing to do with each other. Atari Corp. owned by Tramel, Atari Games former Namco owned and Atari Holding which is still owned by Warner.
Btw it would be nice to see which of the Mods discarded this.

It was me, to perhaps spur discussion about Devs list. As some cleanup work has been done in the list, but there are still duplicates.

Is Atari not Atari Corporation or the other way around? There are 5 options:
Atari
Atari Corporation
Atari Games
Atari Interactive
Atarisoft

Are all of these valid? Should Atari be removed and add Atari Holding instead?
Or should all of them be just changed to Atari?