I'm not much of a "builder", so the only draw for this game for me personally are the levels that are available.
So far, from web articles I'm reading, I'm hearing that there aren't levels out there with that same level of Nintendo quality. And that the most popular levels are sort of "auto" levels where you don't do anything but watch the level take Mario on an auto-course.
So that doesn't sound too appealing. Is there truth to these reports?
I've found it quite easy to build levels, but I'm not enjoying it very much thus far.
The levels I have played-none from you fine, fellow VGCers-haven't been that great. There are a lot of autopilot levels that basically you don't move and it shoots you around. It's entertaining for a bit, but it gets old fast.
Honestly, to me it's a poor-man's LittleBigPlanet. But with the general hypocrisy in gaming journalism, a game like LittleBigPlanet 3 with all it offers averages out to 79-80% overall between GameRankings and Metacritic. Meanwhile, Super Mario Maker with all it's limitations to what you can actually do with it has an overall score of 88-89%. Yep, hypocrisy at it's finest.