1
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
https://vgcollect.com/item/235729 and the same entries in other castegories.
I was just wondering if the title should be "Final Fantasy I-VI Collection" and the alt title "Final Fantasy I-VI Pixel Remaster".
Gamefaqs currently has this series as Pixel Remaster, so it is good the way it is, but you can put "Final Fantasy I-VI Collection" into alt-name if you want. It looks like it is considering the FF logo at the top as the game release and the large Final Fantasy with the numerals as the subtitle.
Colud the developer "h.a.n.d. Inc." renamed to just "h.a.n.d."?
Despite the logo not having the Inc. part in it, three references do:
https://www.hand.co.jp/ (in the page footer)
https://www.mobygames.com/company/hand-inc
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/company/78226-hand-inc
It doesn't matter to me, and I personally feel that business type designations should not be used unless required, however I do not think there is any directive on name formatting for Developers or Publishers. So not really sure whether we would change it because "it looks better" vs information accuracy. Not that I believe there would be some huge outcry from the community by changing this one name... LMK what you think.